Compare Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 vs Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB

Feature Comparison

  • The Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB's Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 27.0% more
  • The Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB's got 16GB Internal Storage, while Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004's Internal Storage is 4GB
  • The RAM on Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB is 50.0% more
 
Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004
Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
20 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
49 Value For Money Score
90 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.9 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR, Pro Mode, Slo-Mo   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
62 x 124 x 9.3 153 x 76.6 x 9.8   
Weight
115 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, Black   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1750mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 vs Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP16MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1750mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant Full HD display at 401PPI
  • Quite good battery life with the 3000mAh unit packed inside with Turbo Charging
  • Quick and accurate fingerprint sensor
  • Excellent primary camera performance with Laser Autofocus
  • Latest Android Marshmallow out of the box with Android N update
The Bad
  • Heating issues while gaming
  • Not a perfect phone for GPS navigation as it lacks Compass sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 with Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB. When you see Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 Vs Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 stands against Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB is Rs. 10,999. The prices for both these products were updated June 25, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page