Compare Sony Xperia M C1904 vs Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060

Feature Comparison

  • The Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060's Screen Size measures in at 5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 20.0% more
  • The Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 has 8GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • Both Sony Xperia M C1904 and Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 have same RAM
 
Sony Xperia M C1904
Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
49 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.9 PPI 186 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Broadcom   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus Broadcom 23550   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face detectionTouch Focus, Digital Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama, Digital zoom -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 4.2 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 4.4   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
124 x 62 x 9.3 143.7 x 77.1 x 9.6   
Weight
115 grams 163 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
1.3W/kg 0.32W/kg   
Head SAR
0.84W/kg 0.21W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
Dolby Atmos Audio -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB 6.72GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
Yes No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1750mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Sony Xperia M C1904 vs Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia M C1904Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1750mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP0.3MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia M C1904 with Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060. When you see Sony Xperia M C1904 Vs Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia M C1904 stands against Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated November 21, 2017.
Report an error on this page