Compare Sony Xperia P vs HTC One E9+

Feature Comparison

  • HTC One E9+ has 27.0% more Screen Size
  • HTC One E9+'s 32GB Internal Storage is more than Sony Xperia P's 16GB Internal Storage
  • HTC One E9+'s RAM is 66.0% more
 
Sony Xperia P
HTC One E9+
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
26 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
51 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
275.4 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 2GHz   
Processor
NovaThor U8500 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 20MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 4MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, 3D Sweep Panorama, Image Stabilization Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (2.3) Sense UI   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
122 x 59.5 x 10.5 156.5 x 76.5 x 7.54   
Weight
120 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver Meteor Grey, Rose Gold   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
13GB 22GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1305mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Sony Xperia P vs HTC One E9+ Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia PHTC One E9+  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP20MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1305mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP4MP  

Sony Xperia P Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Screen is one of the best when it comes to outdoor visibility
  • Feels solid in the hand and has an interesting design
  • Easy to grip and use single handedly
  • A dedicated two stage camera shutter button is present
  • Interesting transparent strip to be used as a notifications LED
The Bad
  • Does not come with the latest Android OS
  • Poor battery life
  • Lacks Micro SD card
  • Display colors are a bit off and not well callibrated
  • Sharp corners make the phone a little painful to hold in the palm and use for a very long time

HTC One E9+ Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Mindboggling display quality at 534PPI with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
  • HTC BoomSound Stereo speakers
  • Metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Decent performance and battery life
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • No fast charging support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia P with HTC One E9+. When you see Sony Xperia P Vs HTC One E9+ comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia P stands against HTC One E9+ and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 16, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page