Compare Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Dual vs HTC One E9+

Feature Comparison

  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Dual has 6 inch Screen Size, whereas HTC One E9+ has 5.5 inch Screen Size
  • The HTC One E9+ has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 75.0% more
  • The HTC One E9+'s got 3GB RAM, while Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Dual's RAM is 1GB
 
Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Dual
HTC One E9+
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
47 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
60 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.8 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 20MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.1MP 4MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Image Stabilization, HDR, Sweep Panorama Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) Sense UI   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
165.2 x 83.8 x 7.7 156.5 x 76.5 x 7.54   
Weight
171 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Purple, White Meteor Grey, Rose Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.33GB 22GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Dual vs HTC One E9+ Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia T2 Ultra DualHTC One E9+  
Screen Size 6 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP20MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.1MP4MP  

HTC One E9+ Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Mindboggling display quality at 534PPI with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
  • HTC BoomSound Stereo speakers
  • Metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Decent performance and battery life
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • No fast charging support

Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Dual Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Big battery along with Stamina mode helps it last longer
  • Physical camera button is a plus if you click a lot of images
The Bad
  • Back gets scratched very easily
  • Low resolution on a big screen means a poor viewing experience

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Dual with HTC One E9+. When you see Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Dual Vs HTC One E9+ comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Dual stands against HTC One E9+ and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC One E9+ is Rs. 19,850. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page