Compare Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 vs BlackBerry DTEK50

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of BlackBerry DTEK50's is 3.0% more than Sony Xperia Z1 C6902
  • Both Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 and BlackBerry DTEK50 have same Internal Storage
  • BlackBerry DTEK50 has 33.0% more RAM
 
Sony Xperia Z1 C6902
BlackBerry DTEK50
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
92 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 423.64 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
20.7MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
1/2.3'' Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama Autofocus, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, TOuchfocus, ISO Setting, Exposure Compansation   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, FM Radio -   
Dimensions (mm)
144.4 x 73.9 x 8.5 72.5 x 147 x 7.4   
Weight
169 grams 135 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, Carbon Gray   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.79GB -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2610mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 vs BlackBerry DTEK50 Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia Z1 C6902BlackBerry DTEK50  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 20.7MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2610mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Dust and waterproof phone
  • Use of glass and metal in the body gives the phone a really premium feel
  • Good battery life
  • An excellent all-rounder device when it comes to performance
The Bad
  • Poor viewing angles and colours on the display
  • No image stabilization is a dissapointment
  • The glass back is prone to shattering if the phone is dropped
  • Comes with too many Sony apps which duplicate what default Google apps do

BlackBerry DTEK50 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent build quality
  • Rear camera performs well
  • Sharp Full HD display
  • Near stock Android experience
The Bad
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • Below average battery life
  • Mediocre overall performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 with BlackBerry DTEK50. When you see Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 Vs BlackBerry DTEK50 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 stands against BlackBerry DTEK50 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for BlackBerry DTEK50 is Rs. 20,799. The prices for both these products were updated April 28, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page