Compare Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 vs HTC Desire 825

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 825's Screen Size is 9.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 is the same as HTC Desire 825
  • Both Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 and HTC Desire 825 have same RAM
 
Sony Xperia Z1 C6902
HTC Desire 825
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
75 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.2GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
20.7MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
1/2.3'' Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) Sense 7 UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
144.4 x 73.9 x 8.5 156.9 x 76.9 x 7.4   
Weight
169 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Stratus White, Graphite Gray   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.79GB 10.5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 vs HTC Desire 825 Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia Z1 C6902HTC Desire 825  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 20.7MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Dust and waterproof phone
  • Use of glass and metal in the body gives the phone a really premium feel
  • Good battery life
  • An excellent all-rounder device when it comes to performance
The Bad
  • Poor viewing angles and colours on the display
  • No image stabilization is a dissapointment
  • The glass back is prone to shattering if the phone is dropped
  • Comes with too many Sony apps which duplicate what default Google apps do

HTC Desire 825 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unique paint splashed body paint
  • BoomSound on the phone gives it an amazing experience when listening to audio
The Bad
  • No Full HD display
  • Sluggish performance when doing very heavy tasks

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 with HTC Desire 825. When you see Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 Vs HTC Desire 825 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia Z1 C6902 stands against HTC Desire 825 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 825 is Rs. 11,899. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page