Compare Sony Xperia Z5 Compact vs Motorola Moto Z Play

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto Z Play's Screen Size is 16.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Sony Xperia Z5 Compact is the same as Motorola Moto Z Play
  • Motorola Moto Z Play has 3GB RAM, whereas Sony Xperia Z5 Compact has 2GB RAM
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
We Love
Motorola Moto Z Play
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
80 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.6 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
319 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 430 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
23MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5.1MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama 1.3 µm pixel size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android O   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, FM Radio Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
127 x 65 x 8.9 156.4 x 76.4 x 6.99   
Weight
138 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- White, Black   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
200GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2700mAh 3510mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, TurboPower   

Sony Xperia Z5 Compact vs Motorola Moto Z Play Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia Z5 CompactMotorola Moto Z Play  
Screen Size 4.6 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 23MP16MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2700mAh3510mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5.1MP5MP  

Motorola Moto Z Play Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality, phone feels good to hold
  • Rear camera captures detailed images
  • Excellent battery life to easily last through the day
  • Supports all existing Moto Mods
  • Bloat free stock Android experience makes the device run flawlessly
The Bad
  • Low light shots with the rear camera don't turn out to be great
  • Lacks Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Processor not being the most powerful may disappoint gamers

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia Z5 Compact with Motorola Moto Z Play. When you see Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Vs Motorola Moto Z Play comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia Z5 Compact stands against Motorola Moto Z Play and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto Z Play is Rs. 22,399. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page