Compare Vivo V1 Max vs Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Vivo V1 Max's Screen Size is 5.0% more
  • Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) has 50.0% more RAM
 
Vivo V1 Max
We Love
Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
61 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
69 Value For Money Score
91 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 4GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Continuos Shooting, Exposure compensation, Face detection, Geo tagging, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Self-timer, Touch to focus, White balance prese Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, auto-HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
Android (5.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android O   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
- 150.2 x 74 x 7.7   
Weight
- 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Lunar Gray, Fine Gold   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.62GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2720mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

Vivo V1 Max vs Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) Specs

Specs
Vivo V1 MaxMotorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP12MP  
RAM 2GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2720mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Vivo V1 Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Full HD display
  • 4G LTE support
  • Slim design
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version

Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy build quality
  • Good battery life with Turbo Charging
  • Decent camera on either sides
  • Dedicated Micro SD card slot
  • Excellent overall performance with near-stock Android Nougat
The Bad
  • Speaker output could have been better
  • Heats up slightly on extensive use of GPS
  • Bundled earphones are very basic

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo V1 Max with Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB). When you see Vivo V1 Max Vs Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo V1 Max stands against Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo V1 Max is currently Rs. 12,000. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) is Rs. 14,888. The prices for both these products were updated August 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page