Compare Vivo V1 Max vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Vivo V1 Max is the same as Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
  • Both Vivo V1 Max and Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) have same Internal Storage
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) has 33.0% more RAM
 
Vivo V1 Max
We Love
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
68 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
69 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 Exynos 7580   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Continuos Shooting, Exposure compensation, Face detection, Geo tagging, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Self-timer, Touch to focus, White balance prese Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (5.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
- 151.5 x 74.1 x 7.3   
Weight
- 172 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White White, Black, Gold   
Build Material
- Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.62GB 10.82GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2720mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Fast Charging   

Vivo V1 Max vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) Specs

Specs
Vivo V1 MaxSamsung Galaxy A7 (2016)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2720mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Vivo V1 Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Full HD display
  • 4G LTE support
  • Slim design
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version

Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent build quality rivaling that of the Galaxy S6
  • Vibrant display with sharp colours
  • Solid battery life that easily lasts a whole day
  • Samsung bundles the phone with very little bloatware
The Bad
  • The UI overall can be sluggish with lags
  • Not a device meant for gaming as it tends to drop quite a lot of frames
  • Camera app takes a while to launch which leads to missing shots
  • Low light shots from the camera have a lot of noise

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo V1 Max with Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016). When you see Vivo V1 Max Vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo V1 Max stands against Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo V1 Max is currently Rs. 11,052. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) is Rs. 17,490. The prices for both these products were updated October 16, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page