Compare Vivo X5Max vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Both Vivo X5Max and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB) have same Screen Size
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB)'s Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB) has 3GB RAM, which is 33.0% more
 
Vivo X5Max
We Love
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
89 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) MIUI 8   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
153.9 x 78 x 4.75 151 x 76 x 8.4   
Weight
146 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold, Black, Dark Gray   
Build Material
Metal Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.26GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

Vivo X5Max vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB) Specs

Specs
Vivo X5MaxXiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Vivo X5Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent display, very sharp at 401PPI
  • Decent 13MP rear camera with Full HD video recording
  • Sleek Metal design
The Bad
  • Below average battery life
  • Outdated Android 4.4 KitKat version
  • Lacks VoLTE support

Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Magnificent battery performance
  • Decent cameras on either sides
  • Build quality feels solid
  • Overall performance of the device is eminent
  • Soon to receive Android Nougat
The Bad
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Bloated MIUI 8

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo X5Max with Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB). When you see Vivo X5Max Vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo X5Max stands against Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo X5Max is currently Rs. 16,499. The lowest price for Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (3GB/32GB) is Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page