Compare Vivo X5Pro vs Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's 5.7 inch Screen Size is more than Vivo X5Pro's 5.2 inch Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Vivo X5Pro
We Love
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
86 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED AMOLED   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 386 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 Qualcomm Snapdragon 626   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (5.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
147.9 x 73.5 x 6.4 156.5 x 77.2 x 7   
Weight
151 grams 172 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold, Pink Gold, Navy Blue   
Build Material
Glass, Metal -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2450mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Vivo X5Pro vs Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro Specs

Specs
Vivo X5ProSamsung Galaxy C7 Pro  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP16MP  
RAM 2GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2450mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  

Vivo X5Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Slim body with just 6.44 mm thickness
  • Performs well, even while multitasking
The Bad
  • Hybrid SIM tray
  • Grossly overpriced
  • Slipper glass back
  • Clunky UI, lacks app-drawer

Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front and back camera both 16MP of very high clarity and quality for camera enthusiasts
  • Internal and expandable memory is ample for majority of the users
  • Battery life is sufficient for a day's moderate usage without having to reach for a charger
The Bad
  • Hybrid SIM slot, which makes the user choose between a second SIM and extra memory
  • Screen size may be a bit much for some users due to palm-fit concerns

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo X5Pro with Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. When you see Vivo X5Pro Vs Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo X5Pro stands against Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo X5Pro is currently Rs. 22,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro is Rs. 24,900. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page