Compare Vivo Y15 vs Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA)

Feature Comparison

  • The 5 inch Screen Size on the Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) is 10.0% more
  • Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA)'s 32GB Internal Storage is more than Vivo Y15's 4GB Internal Storage
  • Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA)'s got 83.0% more RAM
 
Vivo Y15
Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
49 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
130.4 x 65.85 x 8.9 143 x 69.9 x 8.5   
Weight
135 grams 183 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.3GB 23.52GB   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM + CDMA   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Vivo Y15 vs Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) Specs

Specs
Vivo Y15Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA)  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Vivo Y15 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Expandable memory up to 128MB thanks to a Micro SD slot
  • 3G enabled
  • Removable back and battery pack
The Bad
  • Sluggish performance due to just 512MB of RAM
  • Pixelated display attributed to a pixel density of 217 PPI
  • Only 4GB of internal memory

Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp enough display with a pixel density of 294PPI and Asahi Dragontrail Glass protection
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for better multitasking experience
  • Excellent battery backup with the 4000mAh unit
  • 32GB of internal storage
  • Stunning Metal Unibody design
The Bad
  • Average processor performance
  • Still runs on oudated Android 5.1 Lollipop with lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • Expandable storage up to 128GB
  • Average camera performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo Y15 with Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA). When you see Vivo Y15 Vs Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo Y15 stands against Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) is Rs. 15,209. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page