Compare Vivo Y27L vs Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Vivo Y27L's 4.7 inch Screen Size
  • Both Vivo Y27L and Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition have same Internal Storage
  • Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Vivo Y27L
Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
65 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
60 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Normal, Night, Panorama, Bokeh, Face Beauty Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
136.9 x 68.1 x 6.99 142.1 x 72.4 x 11.6   
Weight
137 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Blue Black, White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9GB 11.81GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes, MicroSD   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2260mAh 2470mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

Vivo Y27L vs Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition Specs

Specs
Vivo Y27LMotorola Moto G Turbo Edition  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2260mAh2470mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Vivo Y27L Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Gestures Input to launch apps
  • Slim phone with a metallic back
  • 4G LTE Connectivity
The Bad
  • 1GB of RAM feels inadequate
  • Outdated OS (4.4.2 Kitkat)
  • Lags when Multitasking

Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display with a pixel density of 294PPI and Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Good performance with smooth interface and vanilla Android experience and Android Marshmallow update
  • Water resistant IP67 rating
  • Huge camera quality improvement over previous G series from Motorola
  • VoLTE and Turbo charging support
The Bad
  • Display could have been Full HD
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor which is a must in the price range

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo Y27L with Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition. When you see Vivo Y27L Vs Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo Y27L stands against Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition is Rs. 12,299. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page