Compare Vivo Y27L vs Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime has 5.5 inch Screen Size, whereas Vivo Y27L has 4.7 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Vivo Y27L is the same as Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime
  • The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 66.0% more
 
Vivo Y27L
We Love
Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
45 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
60 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Exynos 7870   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T830   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Normal, Night, Panorama, Bokeh, Face Beauty Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
136.9 x 68.1 x 6.99 151.5 x 74.9 x 8.1   
Weight
137 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Blue Gold, Black   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9GB 10.3GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2260mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Vivo Y27L vs Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime Specs

Specs
Vivo Y27LSamsung Galaxy J7 Prime  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2260mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Vivo Y27L Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Gestures Input to launch apps
  • Slim phone with a metallic back
  • 4G LTE Connectivity
The Bad
  • 1GB of RAM feels inadequate
  • Outdated OS (4.4.2 Kitkat)
  • Lags when Multitasking

Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Sharp display at 401PPI with Gorilla Glass prortection
  • Good battery life that should last through a day for most
  • Decent day-to-day performance
The Bad
  • Performance of the rear camera in low light conditions could be better
  • Lacks fast charging support
  • Rear camera is not capable of recording 4K videos

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo Y27L with Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime. When you see Vivo Y27L Vs Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo Y27L stands against Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime is Rs. 14,290. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page