Compare Xiaomi Mi Max vs Sony Xperia XA Ultra

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Mi Max has 6.0% more Screen Size
  • The 32GB Internal Storage on the Xiaomi Mi Max is 50.0% more
  • RAM of Xiaomi Mi Max is the same as Sony Xperia XA Ultra
 
Xiaomi Mi Max
Sony Xperia XA Ultra
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
80 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
89 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6.44 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
342 PPI 367 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10   
Processor Type
Hexa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 21.5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 16MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR 1/2.4" Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
MIUI 7 -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
173.1 x 88.3 x 7.5 164.2 x 79.4 x 8.4   
Weight
203 grams 190 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Gold, Dark Gray White, Graphite Black, Lime Gold   
Build Material
Metal Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
24GB 10.07GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 200GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4850mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Xiaomi Mi Max vs Sony Xperia XA Ultra Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Mi MaxSony Xperia XA Ultra  
Screen Size 6.44 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP21.5MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4850mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP16MP  

Xiaomi Mi Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Fast fingerprint scanner
  • Fantastic battery life
  • Acceptable camera quality
The Bad
  • Reported issues with 4K video recording
  • Display visibility reportedly not great outdoors

Sony Xperia XA Ultra Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Well built premium build quality with thin bezels
  • Smooth gaming experience
  • Clean & polished UI
  • Stunning selfie camera
The Bad
  • Grossly Overpriced
  • Disappointing display with problematic colour calibration
  • Lacks 4K video recording
  • Mediocre battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Mi Max with Sony Xperia XA Ultra. When you see Xiaomi Mi Max Vs Sony Xperia XA Ultra comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Mi Max stands against Sony Xperia XA Ultra and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Sony Xperia XA Ultra is Rs. 20,480. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page