Compare Xiaomi Mi Max Prime vs BlackBerry DTEK50

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Mi Max Prime's 6.44 inch Screen Size is more than BlackBerry DTEK50's 5.2 inch Screen Size
  • The Xiaomi Mi Max Prime's Internal Storage measures in at 128GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 87.0% more
  • The Xiaomi Mi Max Prime's RAM measures in at 4GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 25.0% more
 
Xiaomi Mi Max Prime
BlackBerry DTEK50
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
80 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
85 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6.44 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
342 PPI 423.64 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
4GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Autofocus, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, TOuchfocus, ISO Setting, Exposure Compansation   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
MiUi 7 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS -   
Dimensions (mm)
173.1 x 88.3 x 7.5 72.5 x 147 x 7.4   
Weight
203 grams 135 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray, Gold Black, Carbon Gray   
Build Material
Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
128GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4850mAh 2610mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No Yes   

Xiaomi Mi Max Prime vs BlackBerry DTEK50 Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Mi Max PrimeBlackBerry DTEK50  
Screen Size 6.44 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 4GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4850mAh2610mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

BlackBerry DTEK50 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent build quality
  • Rear camera performs well
  • Sharp Full HD display
  • Near stock Android experience
The Bad
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • Below average battery life
  • Mediocre overall performance

Xiaomi Mi Max Prime Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Fast fingerprint scanner
  • Fantastic battery life
  • Acceptable camera quality
The Bad
  • Reported issues with 4K video recording
  • Display visibility reportedly not great outdoors

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Mi Max Prime with BlackBerry DTEK50. When you see Xiaomi Mi Max Prime Vs BlackBerry DTEK50 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Mi Max Prime stands against BlackBerry DTEK50 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for BlackBerry DTEK50 is Rs. 17,290. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page