Compare Xiaomi Mi3 vs Honor 6X (4GB/64GB)

Feature Comparison

  • The 5.5 inch Screen Size on the Honor 6X (4GB/64GB) is 9.0% more
  • The Internal Storage on Honor 6X (4GB/64GB) is 75.0% more
  • Honor 6X (4GB/64GB) has 4GB RAM and Xiaomi Mi3 has 2GB RAM
 
Xiaomi Mi3
Honor 6X (4GB/64GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
89 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
72 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm HiSilicon Kirin   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 2.1GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 HiSilicon Kirin 655   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Mali-T830   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Aperture f2.2, Stacked CMOS, Dual-LED Flash, +2MP Rear Camera, Exposure Compensation, ISO Control, Continuous Shooting, HDR, Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face Detection, Touch to Focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Dual Rear Camera, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- Emotion UI 4.1   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
144 x 73.6 x 8.1 150.90 x 72.60 x 8.20   
Weight
145 grams 162 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Gold, Silver, Gray   
Build Material
Metal Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.5GB -   
Card Slot
No No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3050mAh 3340mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Xiaomi Mi3 vs Honor 6X (4GB/64GB) Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Mi3Honor 6X (4GB/64GB)  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP12MP  
RAM 2GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 3050mAh3340mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Xiaomi Mi3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Feel really light in the hand
  • Good screen with accurate color reproduction
  • Powerful overall performance
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • The sharp edges of the lower and upper lip makes using the phone one handed tough
  • Xiaomi is notorious for not rolling out the latest Android updates
  • The speaker at the bottom gets muffled
  • The back of the phone picks up scratches and dents very easily

Honor 6X (4GB/64GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Snappy fingerprint scanner
  • Good for outdoor photography
  • Good battery backup
The Bad
  • Somewhat poor brightness
  • Poor audio playback
  • No fast charging support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Mi3 with Honor 6X (4GB/64GB). When you see Xiaomi Mi3 Vs Honor 6X (4GB/64GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Mi3 stands against Honor 6X (4GB/64GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Xiaomi Mi3 is currently Rs. 13,999. The lowest price for Honor 6X (4GB/64GB) is Rs. 13,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page