Compare Xiaomi Mi3 vs InFocus EPIC 1

Feature Comparison

  • InFocus EPIC 1's Screen Size is 9.0% more
  • The Internal Storage on InFocus EPIC 1 is 50.0% more
  • RAM of InFocus EPIC 1's is 33.0% more than Xiaomi Mi3
 
Xiaomi Mi3
InFocus EPIC 1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
78 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
72 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MediaTek MT6797 Helio x20   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Deca-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Mali-T880 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Aperture f2.2, Stacked CMOS, Dual-LED Flash, Exposure compensation, ISO control, Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face detection, Touch to focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
144 x 73.6 x 8.1 153 x 76 x 8.4   
Weight
145 grams 160 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Rose Gold   
Build Material
Metal -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.5GB -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3050mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Xiaomi Mi3 vs InFocus EPIC 1 Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Mi3InFocus EPIC 1  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP16MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3050mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

InFocus EPIC 1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Crisp Full HD display with Gorilla Glass proection
  • Good performance, thanks to the powerful processor and 3GB RAM
  • Support Reliance Jio network (VoLTE)
  • Rear camera takes decent shots
  • Battery life holds up well and also supports fast charging
The Bad
  • Not the fastest fingerprint sensor
  • Does not ship with the latest Android Nougat
  • Unpolished user interface

Xiaomi Mi3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Feel really light in the hand
  • Good screen with accurate color reproduction
  • Powerful overall performance
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • The sharp edges of the lower and upper lip makes using the phone one handed tough
  • Xiaomi is notorious for not rolling out the latest Android updates
  • The speaker at the bottom gets muffled
  • The back of the phone picks up scratches and dents very easily

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Mi3 with InFocus EPIC 1. When you see Xiaomi Mi3 Vs InFocus EPIC 1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Mi3 stands against InFocus EPIC 1 and which one you should buy. The best price of Xiaomi Mi3 is currently Rs. 13,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page