Compare Xiaomi Mi3 vs Motorola Moto Turbo

Feature Comparison

  • The Motorola Moto Turbo has 5.2 inch Screen Size, which is 3.0% more
  • The Motorola Moto Turbo's got 64GB Internal Storage, while Xiaomi Mi3's Internal Storage is 16GB
  • Motorola Moto Turbo's RAM is 33.0% more
 
Xiaomi Mi3
Motorola Moto Turbo
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
75 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
72 Value For Money Score
83 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 565 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 2.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Qualcomm Snapdragon 805   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Adreno 420   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 21MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Aperture f2.2, Stacked CMOS, Dual-LED Flash, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
144 x 73.6 x 8.1 143.5 x 73.3 x 8.3   
Weight
145 grams 176 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Black   
Build Material
Metal -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.5GB 53.26GB   
Card Slot
No No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3050mAh 3900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- Yes   
Fast Charging
- -   

Xiaomi Mi3 vs Motorola Moto Turbo Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Mi3Motorola Moto Turbo  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP21MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3050mAh3900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

Motorola Moto Turbo Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Quad HD AMOLED Screen with Moto Display feature for quick access to notifications
  • Huge 3900mAh battery
  • Ample 64GB of internal storage
  • Fast charging out of the box
  • Hands-free voice control
The Bad
  • Middling camera quality
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • No TD-LTE (Band 40, 2300MHz) that some Indian 4G networks use

Xiaomi Mi3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Feel really light in the hand
  • Good screen with accurate color reproduction
  • Powerful overall performance
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • The sharp edges of the lower and upper lip makes using the phone one handed tough
  • Xiaomi is notorious for not rolling out the latest Android updates
  • The speaker at the bottom gets muffled
  • The back of the phone picks up scratches and dents very easily

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Mi3 with Motorola Moto Turbo. When you see Xiaomi Mi3 Vs Motorola Moto Turbo comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Mi3 stands against Motorola Moto Turbo and which one you should buy. The best price of Xiaomi Mi3 is currently Rs. 13,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page