Compare Xiaomi Mi3 vs Nokia Lumia 830

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Xiaomi Mi3 is the same as Nokia Lumia 830
  • Internal Storage of Xiaomi Mi3 is the same as Nokia Lumia 830
  • Xiaomi Mi3's 2GB RAM is more than Nokia Lumia 830's 1GB RAM
 
Xiaomi Mi3
Nokia Lumia 830
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
61 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
72 Value For Money Score
57 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 10MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 0.9MP   
Camera Details
Aperture f2.2, Stacked CMOS, Dual-LED Flash, Backside-illuminated Image Sensor, Optical Image Stabilization, PureView, True 16:9 Sensor   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Windows Phone   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Windows Phone 8.1   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
144 x 73.6 x 8.1 139.4 x 70.7 x 8.5   
Weight
145 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Black   
Build Material
Metal -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.5GB -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3050mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Xiaomi Mi3 vs Nokia Lumia 830 Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Mi3Nokia Lumia 830  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP10MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 3050mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP0.9MP  

Xiaomi Mi3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Feel really light in the hand
  • Good screen with accurate color reproduction
  • Powerful overall performance
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • The sharp edges of the lower and upper lip makes using the phone one handed tough
  • Xiaomi is notorious for not rolling out the latest Android updates
  • The speaker at the bottom gets muffled
  • The back of the phone picks up scratches and dents very easily

Nokia Lumia 830 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Aluminium frame on the sides of the phone adds rigidity
  • Excellent camera performance
  • Available in bright colours, which most phones do not offer
  • Rear camera comes with OIS, a bit of a rare feature in mid-range devices
The Bad
  • Overall the Windows ecosystem is weak when it comes to apps
  • Nokia has really cut the corners on the front facing camera
  • Lacks a Full HD display
  • Heavy games struggle on the device

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Mi3 with Nokia Lumia 830. When you see Xiaomi Mi3 Vs Nokia Lumia 830 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Mi3 stands against Nokia Lumia 830 and which one you should buy. The best price of Xiaomi Mi3 is currently Rs. 13,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page