Compare Xiaomi Mi4 vs Lenovo Phab 2 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Phab 2 Plus has 21.0% more Screen Size
  • Lenovo Phab 2 Plus has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Xiaomi Mi4 and Lenovo Phab 2 Plus have same RAM
 
Xiaomi Mi4
Lenovo Phab 2 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
80 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
77 Value For Money Score
89 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 6.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 344.2 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek MT8783   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Camera Details
1/3'' Sensor Size, 1.12µm Pixel Size, Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, HDR +13MP Rear Camera, Digital zoom, Touch focus, HDR, Panorama, Geotagging, Continuous shooting, Exposure compensation, ISO setting, White balance setting, Face detection, Self-timer, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
139.2 x 68.5 x 8.9 174 x 88 x 5.5   
Weight
149 grams 218 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Champagne Gold, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
Metal, Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.24GB -   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3080mAh 4050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Xiaomi Mi4 vs Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Mi4Lenovo Phab 2 Plus  
Screen Size 5 inch6.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3080mAh4050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  

Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Audio output is decent
  • Fast & accurate fingerprint sensor
The Bad
  • Under whelming overall performance
  • Massive size makes it difficult to hold
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Average battery life
  • Schemed dual rear cameras

Xiaomi Mi4 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent build quality
  • Snappy performance
  • Good display
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • Non-Expandable storage
  • MIUI may take time to get used to
  • No 4G Connectivity

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Mi4 with Lenovo Phab 2 Plus. When you see Xiaomi Mi4 Vs Lenovo Phab 2 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Mi4 stands against Lenovo Phab 2 Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Xiaomi Mi4 is currently Rs. 13,990. The lowest price for Lenovo Phab 2 Plus is Rs. 13,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page