Compare Xiaomi Mi4i vs Tecno i3 Pro

Feature Comparison

  • Both Xiaomi Mi4i and Tecno i3 Pro have same Screen Size
  • Both Xiaomi Mi4i and Tecno i3 Pro have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Tecno i3 Pro's is 33.0% more than Xiaomi Mi4i
 
Xiaomi Mi4i
Tecno i3 Pro
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
85 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64 Value For Money Score
66 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Exposure compensation, ISO control, Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face detection, Touch to focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- HiOS   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
138.1 x 69.6 x 7.8 -   
Weight
130 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Grey, Pink, Yellow, Blue Space Gray, Champagne Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.9GB -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 900 / 1800 MHZ   
3G Bands
- UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3120mAh 3050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Xiaomi Mi4i vs Tecno i3 Pro Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Mi4iTecno i3 Pro  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3120mAh3050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Xiaomi Mi4i Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Beautiful display, 5 inch with Full HD resolution
  • Good battery life
  • Powerful Snapdragon 615 processor
The Bad
  • Camera struggles in low light conditions
  • 16GB storage can be restricting, no MicroSD card slot
  • Heating issues, thanks to the Snapdragon 615 chipset

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Mi4i with Tecno i3 Pro. When you see Xiaomi Mi4i Vs Tecno i3 Pro comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Mi4i stands against Tecno i3 Pro and which one you should buy. The best price of Xiaomi Mi4i is currently Rs. 10,990. The lowest price for Tecno i3 Pro is Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated November 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page