Compare Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime vs InFocus M680

Feature Comparison

  • InFocus M680's Screen Size is 14.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime is the same as InFocus M680
  • RAM of Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime is the same as InFocus M680
 
Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime
InFocus M680
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
81 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
69 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 13MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
MIUI Android (5.1)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
134 x 67 x 9 156 x 76.8 x 7.25   
Weight
- -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.33GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2200mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime vs InFocus M680 Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Redmi 2 PrimeInFocus M680  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2200mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP13MP  

InFocus M680 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good looking device even if the design is not the most original
  • Solid construction and feels very secure
  • Useful tweaks in the UI
  • Daylight shots from the camera are good
  • Call quality is really impressive
The Bad
  • The paint on the gold colour unit chips off with regular usage
  • Accessories seem to be made out of really cheap materials
  • Display legibility in direct sunlight is poor
  • Capacitive touch buttons have poor accuracy
  • Push the phone too hard and you will find the phone can get a fair bit warm

Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The screen is crisp and sharp thanks to a pixel density of 312.5 PPI
  • Very comfortable to hold and use single handedly
  • LTE support on both SIM cards
The Bad
  • The capacitive buttons at the bottom are not backlit
  • Outdated Android version with little to no scope of update
  • Autofocus on the camera can be a bit slot and takes its own sweet time to focus

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime with InFocus M680. When you see Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime Vs InFocus M680 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime stands against InFocus M680 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for InFocus M680 is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page