Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) vs Motorola Moto E4 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) is the same as Motorola Moto E4 Plus
  • The Motorola Moto E4 Plus has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • The Motorola Moto E4 Plus's got 3GB RAM, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)'s RAM is 2GB
 
We Love
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)
Motorola Moto E4 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
73 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
92 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Hexa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
MIUI 7 -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150 x 76 x 9 155 x 77.5 x 9.5   
Weight
164 grams 198 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Grey, Gold Iron Gray, Fine Gold   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.48GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4050mAh 5000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No   
Fast Charging
Yes, Fast Charging No   

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) vs Motorola Moto E4 Plus Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)Motorola Moto E4 Plus  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4050mAh5000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Powerful Processor bundled with 2GB of RAM
  • Well calibrated, Crisp, Full HD Display
  • Fingerprint scanner makes it convenient to lock phone and apps
  • Good battery life (4050mAh) and Quick Charging
  • Well Built Metal Unibody
The Bad
  • MIUI may not be to everyone's liking
  • Flash Sale model makes it extremely hard to buy this phone

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) with Motorola Moto E4 Plus. When you see Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) Vs Motorola Moto E4 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) stands against Motorola Moto E4 Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) is currently Rs. 9,799. The lowest price for Motorola Moto E4 Plus is Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page