Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 vs Honor 8 Smart

Feature Comparison

  • The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while Honor 8 Smart's Screen Size is 5.2 inch
  • The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3's Internal Storage measures in at 32GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 33.0% more
 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
Honor 8 Smart
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
70 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
89 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm HiSilicon Kirin   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650   
Processor Type
Hexa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
MIUI 7 -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150 x 76 x 9 146.8 x 72.6 x 7.5   
Weight
164 grams 147 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Grey, Gold White, Gold, Black   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
26.28GB 9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4050mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
Yes, Quick Charge -   

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 vs Honor 8 Smart Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3Honor 8 Smart  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4050mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant Full HD display
  • Great processing power with 3GB RAM
  • Rear mounted fingerprint scanner
  • All metal body offers premium feel
  • Long lasting 4050mAh battery
The Bad
  • Lots of Bloatware pre-installed
  • MIUI interface may not be user friendly for all
  • Outdated Android version
  • Xiaomi is known for not providing Android version software updates

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 with Honor 8 Smart. When you see Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Vs Honor 8 Smart comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 stands against Honor 8 Smart and which one you should buy. The best price of Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 is currently Rs. 11,999. The lowest price for Honor 8 Smart is Rs. 9,499. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page