Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 vs HTC Desire 825

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 is the same as HTC Desire 825
  • The 32GB Internal Storage on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 is 50.0% more
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has 3GB RAM, whereas HTC Desire 825 has 2GB RAM
 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
HTC Desire 825
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
53 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
89 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Hexa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
MIUI 7 Sense 7 UI   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150 x 76 x 9 156.9 x 76.9 x 7.4   
Weight
164 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Grey, Gold Stratus White, Graphite Gray   
Build Material
Metal Unibody -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
26.28GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4050mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
Yes, Quick Charge -   

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 vs HTC Desire 825 Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3HTC Desire 825  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4050mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant Full HD display
  • Great processing power with 3GB RAM
  • Rear mounted fingerprint scanner
  • All metal body offers premium feel
  • Long lasting 4050mAh battery
The Bad
  • Lots of Bloatware pre-installed
  • MIUI interface may not be user friendly for all
  • Outdated Android version
  • Xiaomi is known for not providing Android version software updates

HTC Desire 825 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unique paint splashed body paint
  • BoomSound on the phone gives it an amazing experience when listening to audio
The Bad
  • No Full HD display
  • Sluggish performance when doing very heavy tasks

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 with HTC Desire 825. When you see Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Vs HTC Desire 825 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 stands against HTC Desire 825 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 825 is Rs. 13,900. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page