Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has 5.0% more Screen Size
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has 32GB Internal Storage, whereas HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) has 16GB Internal Storage
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has 3GB RAM and HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) has 2GB RAM
 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
82 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
89 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 569 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Hexa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
MIUI 7 -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150 x 76 x 9 150.99 x 71.99 x 9.61   
Weight
164 grams 168 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Grey, Gold Silver, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
26.28GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4050mAh 2840mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
Yes, Quick Charge -   

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4050mAh2840mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant Full HD display
  • Great processing power with 3GB RAM
  • Rear mounted fingerprint scanner
  • All metal body offers premium feel
  • Long lasting 4050mAh battery
The Bad
  • Lots of Bloatware pre-installed
  • MIUI interface may not be user friendly for all
  • Outdated Android version
  • Xiaomi is known for not providing Android version software updates

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 with HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB). When you see Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 stands against HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 is currently Rs. 11,999. The lowest price for HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) is Rs. 16,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page