Compare Xolo Era 4K vs Apple iPhone 6 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • The Xolo Era 4K has 5 inch Screen Size, which is 5.0% more
  • Apple iPhone 6 32GB has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Xolo Era 4K's is 50.0% more than Apple iPhone 6 32GB
 
Xolo Era 4K
Apple iPhone 6 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
72 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
75 Value For Money Score
85 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1334 x 750 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 325.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Ion-strengthened Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Apple A series   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735P Apple A8   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
- PowerVR GT7600   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 1.2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR Slo-mo Video, Panorama Mode, Auto Image Stabilization, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android iOS   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop iOS 10   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- iOS 11   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Apple Lightning Connector   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
143 x 71.8 × 9.2 138.1 x 67 x 6.9   
Weight
157 grams 129 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio), WiFi Calling   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Dark Blue, White Space Grey, Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.31GB -   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 1810mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Xolo Era 4K vs Apple iPhone 6 32GB Specs

Specs
Xolo Era 4KApple iPhone 6 32GB  
Screen Size 5 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh1810mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP1.2MP  

Xolo Era 4K Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Exceptional battery life
  • Compact design with a good build quality and reassuring feel
  • Mostly stock Android UI
  • Air shuffle lets you use proximity sensor to change songs or radio channels
The Bad
  • Comes pre-loaded with a ton of bloatware
  • Internal memory to the user is very low
  • The back panel is prone to picking up scratches
  • Highly reflective display which can be a little difficult to read in direct sunlight

Apple iPhone 6 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sleek Metal Unibody design
  • Top of the line camera performance
  • Crisp display with 326PPI
The Bad
  • Average battery life
  • No major performance improvements since the iPhone 5s

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Era 4K with Apple iPhone 6 32GB. When you see Xolo Era 4K Vs Apple iPhone 6 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Era 4K stands against Apple iPhone 6 32GB and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Apple iPhone 6 32GB is Rs. 23,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page