Compare Xolo Era 4K vs LYF F1S

Feature Comparison

  • LYF F1S has 3.0% more Screen Size
  • LYF F1S has 32GB Internal Storage and Xolo Era 4K has 8GB Internal Storage
  • LYF F1S has 3GB RAM, whereas Xolo Era 4K has 2GB RAM
 
Xolo Era 4K
LYF F1S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
60 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
75 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 423 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735P Qualcomm Snapdragon 652   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR Auto Frame Rate , Red Eye Reduction, Continuous Auto Focus,Video HDR supported in code Chroma Flash, OptiZoom, UbiFocus ( MultiFocus ), LLV, LLP, EIS   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, EIS, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
143 x 71.8 × 9.2 148 x 73.1 x 7.7   
Weight
157 grams 146 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Dark Blue, White Black, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
- 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.31GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Xolo Era 4K vs LYF F1S Specs

Specs
Xolo Era 4KLYF F1S  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

LYF F1S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • It supports USB Type-C
  • The build quality is admirable
  • Gaming experience is satisfactory
  • Can record 4K videos
The Bad
  • Misses out on fingerprint scanner
  • Mediocre camera quality

Xolo Era 4K Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Exceptional battery life
  • Compact design with a good build quality and reassuring feel
  • Mostly stock Android UI
  • Air shuffle lets you use proximity sensor to change songs or radio channels
The Bad
  • Comes pre-loaded with a ton of bloatware
  • Internal memory to the user is very low
  • The back panel is prone to picking up scratches
  • Highly reflective display which can be a little difficult to read in direct sunlight

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Era 4K with LYF F1S. When you see Xolo Era 4K Vs LYF F1S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Era 4K stands against LYF F1S and which one you should buy. The lowest price for LYF F1S is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page