Compare Xolo Era X vs Sony Xperia XA Ultra

Feature Comparison

  • Sony Xperia XA Ultra's Screen Size is 16.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Sony Xperia XA Ultra's is 50.0% more than Xolo Era X
  • The Sony Xperia XA Ultra's got 3GB RAM, while Xolo Era X's RAM is 2GB
 
Xolo Era X
Sony Xperia XA Ultra
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
61 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 367 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC9830 MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 21.5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 16MP   
Camera Details
- 1/2.4" Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
145.50 x 72.00 x 8.45 164.2 x 79.4 x 8.4   
Weight
140 grams 190 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, Graphite Black, Lime Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.31GB 10.07GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 200GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Xolo Era X vs Sony Xperia XA Ultra Specs

Specs
Xolo Era XSony Xperia XA Ultra  
Screen Size 5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP21.5MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP16MP  

Xolo Era X Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display with Corning Gorilla Glass protection
  • Decent multitasking experience, thanks to the 2GB RAM
  • 4G LTE connectivity with VoLTE support
  • K-class amplifier and Box speakers enhance music experience
  • Soon to receive Android Marshmallow update
The Bad
  • Runs on Android 5.0 Lollipop out of the box
  • Only 8GB of internal storage

Sony Xperia XA Ultra Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Well built premium build quality with thin bezels
  • Smooth gaming experience
  • Clean & polished UI
  • Stunning selfie camera
The Bad
  • Grossly Overpriced
  • Disappointing display with problematic colour calibration
  • Lacks 4K video recording
  • Mediocre battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Era X with Sony Xperia XA Ultra. When you see Xolo Era X Vs Sony Xperia XA Ultra comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Era X stands against Sony Xperia XA Ultra and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Sony Xperia XA Ultra is Rs. 22,100. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page