Compare Yu Yureka vs Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Both Yu Yureka and Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB) have same Screen Size
  • Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB)'s 32GB Internal Storage is more than Yu Yureka's 16GB Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB) is 33.0% more
 
Yu Yureka
Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
66 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Panorama, Auto-HDR, Pro Mode, Slo-Mo   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
- 141.5 x 70.7 x 11   
Weight
- 160 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray Black, White   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12GB 26.94GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

Yu Yureka vs Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB) Specs

Specs
Yu YurekaMotorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Yu Yureka Pros & Cons

The Good
  • CyanogenMod brings a ton of customizations
  • Smooth performer in day to day tasks with no visible stutter
  • Removable back panel and battery
  • Matt finishing on the back cover provides excellent grip
The Bad
  • The home button has no backlight
  • Tends to heat up when playing games
  • Low light shots from the rear camera have a lot of noise

Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant Full HD display at 401PPI
  • Quite decent battery life by the 3000mAh unit packed inside with Turbo Charging
  • Impressive primary camera performance
  • Latest Android Marshmallow out of the box with Android Nougat update
The Bad
  • Heating issues while gaming
  • Not a perfect phone for GPS navigation as it lacks Compass sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Yu Yureka with Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB). When you see Yu Yureka Vs Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Yu Yureka stands against Motorola Moto G4 (3GB/32GB) and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page