Compare Asus Zenfone 5 16GB vs InFocus M370

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Asus Zenfone 5 16GB is the same as InFocus M370
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Asus Zenfone 5 16GB is 50.0% more
  • Both Asus Zenfone 5 16GB and InFocus M370 have same RAM
 
Asus Zenfone 5 16GB
InFocus M370
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
60 Value For Money Score
59 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Intel Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 1.1GHz   
Processor
Intel Atom Z2560 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 Adreno 302   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
F2.0 Aperture, PixelMaster -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
148.2 x 72.8 x 10.34 143 x 71.5 x 8.1   
Weight
145 grams 125 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, White, Black, Red Black, White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase. -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.21GB 3.97GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2110mAh 2230mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Asus Zenfone 5 16GB vs InFocus M370 Specs

Specs
Asus Zenfone 5 16GBInFocus M370  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2110mAh2230mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

Asus Zenfone 5 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Full HD video recording
The Bad
  • Lacks 4G LTE support
  • Average battery life
  • Mediocre performance
  • Outdated Android version (4.3 Jelly Bean)

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Asus Zenfone 5 16GB with InFocus M370. When you see Asus Zenfone 5 16GB Vs InFocus M370 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Asus Zenfone 5 16GB stands against InFocus M370 and which one you should buy. The best price of Asus Zenfone 5 16GB is currently Rs. 8,990. The lowest price for InFocus M370 is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page