Compare Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MP vs Honor 8 Smart

Feature Comparison

  • The Honor 8 Smart's got 5.2 inch Screen Size, while Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MP's Screen Size is 4.5 inch
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Honor 8 Smart is 50.0% more
  • Honor 8 Smart's 2GB RAM is more than Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MP's 1GB RAM
 
Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MP
Honor 8 Smart
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
30 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
59 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm HiSilicon Kirin   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 HiSilicon Kirin 650   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 302 Mali-T830 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
ZenUI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
136.5 x 67 x 3.6 146.8 x 72.6 x 7.5   
Weight
125 grams 147 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Sheer Gold, Lemon Yellow, Silver Blue, Silver White, Gold, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 year manufacturer's warranty for the device, Battery, Adapter comes with pack of 6 months Warranty and 3 months for USB Data Cable.   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900   
3G Bands
- UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900   
4G Bands
- TD-LTE 2300, FD-LTE 2100 / 1800 / 2600 / 900 / 850 / 800   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2070mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MP vs Honor 8 Smart Specs

Specs
Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MPHonor 8 Smart  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2070mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MP with Honor 8 Smart. When you see Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MP Vs Honor 8 Smart comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MP stands against Honor 8 Smart and which one you should buy. The best price of Asus Zenfone Go 4.5 2nd Gen 8MP is currently Rs. 4,999. The lowest price for Honor 8 Smart is Rs. 8,825. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page