Compare Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GB vs Nubia N1 lite

Feature Comparison

  • Nubia N1 lite has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Both Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GB and Nubia N1 lite have same Internal Storage
  • Both Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GB and Nubia N1 lite have same RAM
 
Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GB
Nubia N1 lite
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
28 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
51 Value For Money Score
85 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6580 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
144.5 x 71 x 9.98 153 x 77.5 x 8.4   
Weight
135 grams 171 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, Gold   
Build Material
- Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.03W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.7W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 20(800)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2070mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GB vs Nubia N1 lite Specs

Specs
Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GBNubia N1 lite  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2070mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display with fairly sharpness at 294PPI
  • Decent performance for day-to-day tasks with 2GB RAM
The Bad
  • Lacks 4G LTE support
  • Average battery life with just 2070mAh unit

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GB with Nubia N1 lite. When you see Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GB Vs Nubia N1 lite comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Asus ZenFone Go (ZC500TG) 16GB stands against Nubia N1 lite and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Nubia N1 lite is Rs. 5,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 10, 2017.
Report an error on this page