Compare BlackBerry 9720 vs Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB has 46.0% more Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB is 98.0% more
  • Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB's 2GB RAM is more than BlackBerry 9720's 512MB RAM
 
BlackBerry 9720
Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
44 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.8 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 360 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
214.3 PPI 423.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
806MHz 2.5GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 801   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 330   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Image Stabilization -   
Video Recording Resolution
- 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS v7 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Barometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
114 x 66 x 12 140.8 x 72.4 x 9.97   
Weight
120 grams 144 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Purple Royal Blue, Cognac Leather   
Build Material
- Metal, Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
512MB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 23GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 20(800)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1450mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Quick Charge 2.0   

BlackBerry 9720 vs Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB Specs

Specs
BlackBerry 9720Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB  
Screen Size 2.8 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1450mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP  

Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unique, useful software features
  • Solid acoustic experience from earpiece to speakerphone
  • Excellent build quality, feels good to hold
  • Very sharp Full HD AMOLED display with great color reproduction
The Bad
  • No MicroSD slot
  • Average battery backup

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry 9720 with Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB. When you see BlackBerry 9720 Vs Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry 9720 stands against Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen 32GB and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry 9720 is currently Rs. 5,550. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page