Compare BlackBerry Bold 9790 vs Motorola Moto E3 Power

Feature Comparison

  • The 5 inch Screen Size on the Motorola Moto E3 Power is 52.0% more
  • Motorola Moto E3 Power's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Motorola Moto E3 Power's RAM is 62.0% more
 
BlackBerry Bold 9790
Motorola Moto E3 Power
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
9 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
44 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 360 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
250 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735P   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
768MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Image Stabilization Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geo-tagging, Panorama, HDR, Touchfocus, Face detection, White balance setting, Scene mode, Self-timer, Exposure compensation, ISO settings   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS v7 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touch and Type Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
- GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
110 x 60 x 11.4 143.8 x 71.6 x 9.55   
Weight
107 grams 153 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Black, White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.96GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1230mAh 3500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

BlackBerry Bold 9790 vs Motorola Moto E3 Power Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Bold 9790Motorola Moto E3 Power  
Screen Size 2.4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 768MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1230mAh3500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Motorola Moto E3 Power Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent battery life with the 3500mAh unit
  • Sharp display with HD resolution
  • Clean near stock Android Marshmallow out of the box
  • 4G LTE support with VoLTE
The Bad
  • Viewing angles and color reproduction of the display is not the best
  • Average overall performance of the device
  • Mediocre results from either cameras

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Bold 9790 with Motorola Moto E3 Power. When you see BlackBerry Bold 9790 Vs Motorola Moto E3 Power comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Bold 9790 stands against Motorola Moto E3 Power and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 10, 2017.
Report an error on this page