Compare BlackBerry Curve 3G 9300 vs Samsung Galaxy J2

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy J2's got 46.0% more Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy J2's got 96.0% more Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Samsung Galaxy J2 is 75.0% more
 
BlackBerry Curve 3G 9300
Samsung Galaxy J2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
11 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
45 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.5 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD Super AMOLED   
Pixel Density
160 PPI 234 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
- 1.3GHz   
Processor
- Exynos 3475   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
256MB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
1600x1200 Pixels Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS v5 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
- GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
109 x 60 x 13.9 136.5 x 69 x 8.4   
Weight
104 grams 130 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Black, Gold, White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 6 Months Warranty On Accessories   
Body SAR
- 1.27W/kg   
Head SAR
- 1.18W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
256MB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 3.9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1150mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

BlackBerry Curve 3G 9300 vs Samsung Galaxy J2 Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Curve 3G 9300Samsung Galaxy J2  
Screen Size 2.5 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  
RAM 256MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1150mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP  

Samsung Galaxy J2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • AMOLED display accounts for a bright display with good color reproduction
  • Dedicated SIM slots for both the SIM cards and LTE support on both SIM cards
  • Ultra data saving mode is an interesting software addition to help you save data consumption
  • Virtually bloatware free
The Bad
  • TouchWiz is bad news for 1GB of RAM as the phone struggles a bit in day to day tasks
  • Lack of ambient light sensor means there is no Auto Brightness
  • Camera is very average and colours are muted and lack a punch

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Curve 3G 9300 with Samsung Galaxy J2. When you see BlackBerry Curve 3G 9300 Vs Samsung Galaxy J2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Curve 3G 9300 stands against Samsung Galaxy J2 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J2 is Rs. 6,850. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page