Compare BlackBerry Curve 9320 vs Intex Aqua 5.5 VR

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Intex Aqua 5.5 VR's is 56.0% more than BlackBerry Curve 9320
  • Intex Aqua 5.5 VR's Internal Storage is 93.0% more
  • The 1GB RAM on the Intex Aqua 5.5 VR is 50.0% more
 
BlackBerry Curve 9320
Intex Aqua 5.5 VR
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
44 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
166.7 PPI 269 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
- 1.2GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Image Stabilization Face Beauty, Panorama Mode, Gesture Capture, Anti Shake, Smile Shot   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS v7 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
109 x 60 x 12.7 153.7 x 72.8 x 9.9   
Weight
103 grams 176 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Champagne, Blue   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- 0.796W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.557W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
512MB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 -   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1450mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

BlackBerry Curve 9320 vs Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Curve 9320Intex Aqua 5.5 VR  
Screen Size 2.4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP5MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1450mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Impressive battery life
  • VoLTE & VR supported
  • Speaker output is decent
The Bad
  • Not that great a performer
  • Average cameras on either sides
  • Slow charging
  • Median VR experience

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Curve 9320 with Intex Aqua 5.5 VR. When you see BlackBerry Curve 9320 Vs Intex Aqua 5.5 VR comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Curve 9320 stands against Intex Aqua 5.5 VR and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Curve 9320 is currently Rs. 3,900. The lowest price for Intex Aqua 5.5 VR is Rs. 4,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page