Compare BlackBerry Curve 9320 vs Yu Yunicorn

Feature Comparison

  • Yu Yunicorn's Screen Size is 56.0% more
  • The 32GB Internal Storage on the Yu Yunicorn is 98.0% more
  • Yu Yunicorn's 4GB RAM is more than BlackBerry Curve 9320's 512MB RAM
 
BlackBerry Curve 9320
Yu Yunicorn
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
44 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
166.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
- 1.8GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10   
Processor Type
- Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 4GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Image Stabilization -   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS v7 YU OS   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
109 x 60 x 12.7 153.3 x 75.4 x 8.1   
Weight
103 grams 172 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Rush Gold, Silver Rush   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year Product Warranty & 6 months for accessories   
Body SAR
- 0.81W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.52W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
512MB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 25GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1450mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

BlackBerry Curve 9320 vs Yu Yunicorn Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Curve 9320Yu Yunicorn  
Screen Size 2.4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP13MP  
RAM 512MB4GB  
Battery Capacity 1450mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Yu Yunicorn Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality with a nice premium-ness about it
  • Fantastic battery life
  • Fingerprint scanner is fast and accurate
  • Colours are sharp and pack a punch
The Bad
  • The phone feels a bit bulky and heavy
  • Missing an FM Radio
  • Camera shutter speed can be slow, overall camera performance is very average
  • Few duplicate apps are included

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Curve 9320 with Yu Yunicorn. When you see BlackBerry Curve 9320 Vs Yu Yunicorn comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Curve 9320 stands against Yu Yunicorn and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Curve 9320 is currently Rs. 4,845. The lowest price for Yu Yunicorn is Rs. 8,670. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page