Compare BlackBerry Leap vs Tecno i3

Feature Comparison

  • Both BlackBerry Leap and Tecno i3 have same Screen Size
  • Both BlackBerry Leap and Tecno i3 have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of BlackBerry Leap is the same as Tecno i3
 
BlackBerry Leap
Tecno i3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 225 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama, Video Image Stabilization Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face detection, Touch to focus, Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10 HiOS   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
144 x 72.8 x 9.5 142.75 x 70.5 x 7.9   
Weight
170 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Space Gray, Champ Gold   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase. -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 12GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 900 / 1800 MHZ   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 UMTS 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 3050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

BlackBerry Leap vs Tecno i3 Specs

Specs
BlackBerry LeapTecno i3  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh3050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Leap with Tecno i3. When you see BlackBerry Leap Vs Tecno i3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Leap stands against Tecno i3 and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Leap is currently Rs. 8,650. The lowest price for Tecno i3 is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page