Compare BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983 vs BlackBerry DTEK60

Feature Comparison

  • The BlackBerry DTEK60's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983's Screen Size is 3.1 inch
  • BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983 has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • BlackBerry DTEK60 has 4GB RAM, whereas BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983 has 2GB RAM
 
BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983
BlackBerry DTEK60
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
39 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
51 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.1 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
720 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
328.5 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 820   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 4GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 530   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 21MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Continuos Shooting, Touch To Focus Continuous shooting, Touch focus, Panorama, HDR, Digital Zoom, Geotagging, Face detection, Self-timer, Exposure Compensation, White balance settings, ISO settings   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10.2 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, Stereo Speakers, GPS   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
119 x 67.1 x 10.6 153.9 x 75.4 x 7   
Weight
140 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm USB Type C   
Color
Black Black   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 200GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983 vs BlackBerry DTEK60 Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983BlackBerry DTEK60  
Screen Size 3.1 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP21MP  
RAM 2GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

BlackBerry DTEK60 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Premium looking glass-metal sandwich design
  • Impressive audio output
  • Crisp and sharp display
  • Enhanced security features
The Bad
  • Strange placement of volume rockers
  • Sub-par camera performance in low-light conditions
  • Below-average battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983 with BlackBerry DTEK60. When you see BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983 Vs BlackBerry DTEK60 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Porsche Design P9983 stands against BlackBerry DTEK60 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for BlackBerry DTEK60 is Rs. 38,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page