Compare BlackBerry Q10 vs Oppo Yoyo R2001

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Oppo Yoyo R2001 is 34.0% more
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the BlackBerry Q10 is 75.0% more
  • The BlackBerry Q10's got 2GB RAM, while Oppo Yoyo R2001's RAM is 1GB
 
BlackBerry Q10
Oppo Yoyo R2001
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
67 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
57 Value For Money Score
52 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.1 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
720 x 720 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
328.5 PPI 234.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
TI OMAP 4470 MediaTek MT6582M   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Autofocus, Geo-Tagging, Image Stabilization, Face Detection Geotagging, Face detection, Touch focus, Panorama, HRD   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10 Android (4.2)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touch and Type Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
119.6 x 66.8 x 10.4 138.5 x 69.5 x 9.2   
Weight
139 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on phone and 6 month on Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Cover   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 2GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 1900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
- No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- No   

BlackBerry Q10 vs Oppo Yoyo R2001 Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Q10Oppo Yoyo R2001  
Screen Size 3.1 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh1900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

BlackBerry Q10 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The full QWERTY keyboard is exceptional
  • Good display with accurate colour reproduction
  • Battery life easily lasts you a day
  • BB10 has some interesting features that iOS and Android miss out
The Bad
  • Despite a good screen, the screen size is too small and has an awkward resolution
  • Below par camera performance
  • App ecosystem is weak on BlackBerry
  • Lacks FM Radio

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Q10 with Oppo Yoyo R2001. When you see BlackBerry Q10 Vs Oppo Yoyo R2001 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Q10 stands against Oppo Yoyo R2001 and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Q10 is currently Rs. 8,989. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page