Compare Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift vs Intex Aqua 5.5 VR

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Intex Aqua 5.5 VR's is 18.0% more than Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift
  • Both Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift and Intex Aqua 5.5 VR have same Internal Storage
  • Both Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift and Intex Aqua 5.5 VR have same RAM
 
Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift
Intex Aqua 5.5 VR
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
68 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
66 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 269 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
- 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735M MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP1 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Face Beauty, Panorama Mode, Gesture Capture, Anti Shake, Smile Shot   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
134 x 67 x 8.3 153.7 x 72.8 x 9.9   
Weight
128 grams 176 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, White Gold Champagne, Blue   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- 0.796W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.557W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1600mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
- No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift vs Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Specs

Specs
Celkon Diamond Q4G SwiftIntex Aqua 5.5 VR  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1600mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.3MP5MP  

Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Impressive battery life
  • VoLTE & VR supported
  • Speaker output is decent
The Bad
  • Not that great a performer
  • Average cameras on either sides
  • Slow charging
  • Median VR experience

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift with Intex Aqua 5.5 VR. When you see Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift Vs Intex Aqua 5.5 VR comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift stands against Intex Aqua 5.5 VR and which one you should buy. The best price of Celkon Diamond Q4G Swift is currently Rs. 4,790. The lowest price for Intex Aqua 5.5 VR is Rs. 4,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 10, 2017.
Report an error on this page