Compare Coolpad Dazen X7 vs LYF Wind 2

Feature Comparison

  • The 6 inch Screen Size on the LYF Wind 2 is 13.0% more
  • Both Coolpad Dazen X7 and LYF Wind 2 have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Coolpad Dazen X7 is the same as LYF Wind 2
 
Coolpad Dazen X7
LYF Wind 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
63 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6595 MediaTek MT6735M   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
PowerVR G6200 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Optical Image Stabilizer Multi Angle View Mode, ASD, Face Detection, Video Snapshot, Smile Shot and Gesture Capture   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Cool UI 6.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146.6 × 73.6 × 6.5 157.5 x 81 x 8.5   
Weight
131 grams 223 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB 11.19GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900, W-CDMA 900 / 2100 -   
3G Bands
TD-SCDMA 1900 / 2000 -   
4G Bands
LTE 1800 / 2100 / 2600, LTE-TD 1900 / 2300 / 2500 -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2700mAh 2850mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No -   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Coolpad Dazen X7 vs LYF Wind 2 Specs

Specs
Coolpad Dazen X7LYF Wind 2  
Screen Size 5.2 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2700mAh2850mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Coolpad Dazen X7 with LYF Wind 2. When you see Coolpad Dazen X7 Vs LYF Wind 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Coolpad Dazen X7 stands against LYF Wind 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Coolpad Dazen X7 is currently Rs. 6,999. The lowest price for LYF Wind 2 is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 10, 2017.
Report an error on this page