Compare Coolpad Dazen X7 vs Vivo Y21

Feature Comparison

  • The Coolpad Dazen X7 has 5.2 inch Screen Size, which is 13.0% more
  • Both Coolpad Dazen X7 and Vivo Y21 have same Internal Storage
  • The 2GB RAM on the Coolpad Dazen X7 is 50.0% more
 
Coolpad Dazen X7
Vivo Y21
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
29 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
51 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 218 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6595 MediaTek MT6580   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
PowerVR G6200 Mali-400   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Optical Image Stabilizer Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR, HD Recording (720p), 30 Frames per second (fps)   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Cool UI 6.0 Funtouch OS 2.1   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146.6 × 73.6 × 6.5 130.7 x 66.4 x 9.2   
Weight
131 grams 157 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White White, Gray   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB 11.6GB   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900, W-CDMA 900 / 2100 GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900   
3G Bands
TD-SCDMA 1900 / 2000 UMTS 2100 / 850 / 900   
4G Bands
LTE 1800 / 2100 / 2600, LTE-TD 1900 / 2300 / 2500 -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2700mAh 1900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Coolpad Dazen X7 vs Vivo Y21 Specs

Specs
Coolpad Dazen X7Vivo Y21  
Screen Size 5.2 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2700mAh1900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Coolpad Dazen X7 with Vivo Y21. When you see Coolpad Dazen X7 Vs Vivo Y21 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Coolpad Dazen X7 stands against Vivo Y21 and which one you should buy. The best price of Coolpad Dazen X7 is currently Rs. 6,999. The lowest price for Vivo Y21 is Rs. 7,000. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page