Compare Coolpad Mega 3 vs Videocon Ultra 30

Feature Comparison

  • Coolpad Mega 3 has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Videocon Ultra 30 has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Videocon Ultra 30 has 33.0% more RAM
 
Coolpad Mega 3
Videocon Ultra 30
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
67 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
58 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD -   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6737 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Face detection, Continuous shooting, ISO settings, Touch focus, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Geotagging, White balance settings, Self timer, Scene mode Exposure compensation, ISO control, Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR),   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
CoolUI 8.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
154.4 x 76.8 x 8.35 144 x 73.8 x 9.8   
Weight
170 grams 166.5 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Moondust Gray Blue   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Triple Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE band (2100), (1800), (850), (2600), (800), (2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3050mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Coolpad Mega 3 vs Videocon Ultra 30 Specs

Specs
Coolpad Mega 3Videocon Ultra 30  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3050mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Coolpad Mega 3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Triple SIM support
  • Supports Reliance Jio network (VoLTE enabled)
The Bad
  • Mediocre overall performance
  • Average battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Coolpad Mega 3 with Videocon Ultra 30. When you see Coolpad Mega 3 Vs Videocon Ultra 30 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Coolpad Mega 3 stands against Videocon Ultra 30 and which one you should buy. The best price of Coolpad Mega 3 is currently Rs. 7,299. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page