Compare Coolpad Note 3 Lite vs Coolpad Note 3 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Coolpad Note 3 Plus's 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than Coolpad Note 3 Lite's 5 inch Screen Size
  • Both Coolpad Note 3 Lite and Coolpad Note 3 Plus have same Internal Storage
  • Both Coolpad Note 3 Lite and Coolpad Note 3 Plus have same RAM
 
Coolpad Note 3 Lite
Coolpad Note 3 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
82 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Cool UI 6.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
140.8 x 70.4 x 8.9 151.00 x 77.00 x 9.30   
Weight
142 grams 168 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne White, Black, Gold Champagne White, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.6GB 14.23GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No -   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Coolpad Note 3 Lite vs Coolpad Note 3 Plus Specs

Specs
Coolpad Note 3 LiteCoolpad Note 3 Plus  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Coolpad Note 3 Lite Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Small size makes it comfortable to hold and use
  • Fingerprint Scanner helps secure phone and apps
  • 3GB RAM along with 16GB internal storage is impressive
The Bad
  • Camera Quality is average

Coolpad Note 3 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent build despite the plasticky materials
  • Decent camera
  • Quick fingerprint scanning
  • Some useful software tweaks included
The Bad
  • Not suited for heavy use
  • Underpowered Graphics for that 1080p display
  • Cannot handle a lot of heavy games

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Coolpad Note 3 Lite with Coolpad Note 3 Plus. When you see Coolpad Note 3 Lite Vs Coolpad Note 3 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Coolpad Note 3 Lite stands against Coolpad Note 3 Plus and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Coolpad Note 3 Plus is Rs. 9,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page