Compare Gionee Elife S5.1 vs HTC Desire 10 lifestyle

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 10 lifestyle has 12.0% more Screen Size
  • HTC Desire 10 lifestyle's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • The HTC Desire 10 lifestyle has 3GB RAM, which is 66.0% more
 
Gionee Elife S5.1
HTC Desire 10 lifestyle
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
86 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
58 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.8 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
306 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, ISO settings, Touch Focus, Face detection, Panorama, HDR, Digital zoom, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Macro mode Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Amigo 2.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
139.8 x 67.4 x 5.2 156.9 x 76.9 x 7.7   
Weight
98 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black, Blue, Pink Stone Black, Polar White   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 2TB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2050mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No Yes   

Gionee Elife S5.1 vs HTC Desire 10 lifestyle Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife S5.1HTC Desire 10 lifestyle  
Screen Size 4.8 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2050mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

HTC Desire 10 lifestyle Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Corning Gorilla Glass protection
  • Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
The Bad
  • Weak performance, thanks to the dated processor
  • Underwhelming battery life
  • Lacks VoLTE support
  • Average display quality

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife S5.1 with HTC Desire 10 lifestyle. When you see Gionee Elife S5.1 Vs HTC Desire 10 lifestyle comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife S5.1 stands against HTC Desire 10 lifestyle and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page