Compare Gionee Elife S5.1 vs Vivo Y28

Feature Comparison

  • The 4.8 inch Screen Size on the Gionee Elife S5.1 is 2.0% more
  • Gionee Elife S5.1's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Gionee Elife S5.1 is the same as Vivo Y28
 
Gionee Elife S5.1
Vivo Y28
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
69 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
53 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.8 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
306 PPI 234.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, ISO settings, Touch Focus, Face detection, Panorama, HDR, Digital zoom, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Macro mode Face Beauty, Panorama mode   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.2 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Amigo 2.0 Android (4.2)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
139.8 x 67.4 x 5.2 137.37 x 68.57 x 9.78   
Weight
98 grams 156 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black, Blue, Pink White, Blue   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4.33GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2050mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Gionee Elife S5.1 vs Vivo Y28 Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife S5.1Vivo Y28  
Screen Size 4.8 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2050mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Vivo Y28 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Some neat software tricks like Smart Wake and Super Screenshot
  • User removable battery and the back panel
The Bad
  • No Dual SIM
  • No 4G LTE connectivity
  • Lack of HD display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife S5.1 with Vivo Y28. When you see Gionee Elife S5.1 Vs Vivo Y28 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife S5.1 stands against Vivo Y28 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo Y28 is Rs. 10,990. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page