Compare Gionee GPAD G4 vs HTC One ME

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Gionee GPAD G4's is 8.0% more than HTC One ME
  • Internal Storage of HTC One ME's is 50.0% more than Gionee GPAD G4
  • The 3GB RAM on the HTC One ME is 66.0% more
 
Gionee GPAD G4
HTC One ME
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
47 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.7 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
257.6 PPI 564.8 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6589T MediaTek MT6795T Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 MP PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 20MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 4MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face and Smile Detection, Panorama, Continuous shooting, Autofocus, Dual-LED (Dual Tone) Flash Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
163.5 x 81.3 x 7.95 151 x 72 x 9.8   
Weight
- 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gray, Gold   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3200mAh 2840mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Gionee GPAD G4 vs HTC One ME Specs

Specs
Gionee GPAD G4HTC One ME  
Screen Size 5.7 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP20MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3200mAh2840mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP4MP  

HTC One ME Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Mindboggling display quality at 565PPI
  • HTC BoomSound Stereo speakers
  • Metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Quick unlock with fingerprint sensor
  • Decent performance and battery life
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Lacks fast charging support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee GPAD G4 with HTC One ME. When you see Gionee GPAD G4 Vs HTC One ME comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee GPAD G4 stands against HTC One ME and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC One ME is Rs. 21,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page